Arbeloa charged as Etihad threatens Premier League legal action
Craven CottageThe Premier League is facing a turbulent week of legal threats and disciplinary clashes on multiple fronts.
Fulham manager Alvaro Arbeloa has been hit with an FA misconduct charge, while Manchester City’s primary sponsor, Etihad Airways, is threatening legal action against the league.

It leaves English football’s top flight locked in a double-headed battle with both an angry manager and a multi-billion-pound global airline.
Arbeloa faces disciplinary action
The Football Association decided to act after Arbeloa made highly controversial comments following his side’s 1-1 draw with Manchester United on September 20.

The Fulham boss was furious after Michael Carrick’s side snatched a late point at Craven Cottage through a deflected Matheus Cunha equaliser in the 89th minute.
Speaking in a post-match television interview, Arbeloa said:
“I knew after the game against Man City that they [would not] let Manchester United lose here,”
The governing body did not take kindly to the Spaniard’s suggestions of refereeing favouritism.
Confirming the disciplinary action, the Football Association stated that the Fulham manager:
“acted in an improper manner by making comments in a postmatch interview that imply bias and/or question the integrity of a match official.”
The Fulham head coach has until Thursday to respond to the misconduct charge.
It adds further pressure on Arbeloa, who took charge of the London club in the summer but has yet to secure a single league victory.
United have also endured a difficult start, winning just once in their opening five matches against Ipswich Town, alongside a defeat to Hull and a draw with Everton.
Sponsor threatens legal fightback
While Fulham deal with their manager’s disciplinary issues, a much larger legal storm is brewing in Manchester.
Etihad Airways has announced it is considering legal action against the Premier League after an independent commission found Manchester City guilty of serious financial breaches.
The commission ruled that City had set up “sham” contracts to artificially inflate their revenues by £830 million.
In a strongly worded public statement, Etihad Airways announced:
“Etihad categorically rejects any finding, conclusion or implication that suggests the airline has ever been involved in improper commercial arrangements.”
The airline has sponsored the reigning Premier League champions since 2009, holding both shirt and stadium naming rights.
Although Etihad was not explicitly named in the published judgment, the company insists the fallout has caused severe reputational damage.
The airline expressed deep frustration at the handling of the process, stating:
“At no time did the Premier League reach out to or engage with Etihad in the process associated with the commission’s opinion.”
A bitter dispute over sponsorship
The airline is now seeking legal advice to protect its commercial interests, marking a dramatic escalation in the fallout from City’s guilty verdict.
City’s chief executive, Ferran Soriano, has already dismissed the independent commission’s findings as a “conspiracy theory” in a message to club staff.
The club has confirmed its intention to appeal against the decision, which saw them found guilty of 114 of 115 charges.
The independent commission also expressed regret that the disciplinary process had taken so long to resolve.
The formal hearings regarding the charges took place between September and December 2024.
Despite the controversy, Etihad has reiterated its strong commitment to the club and its global fan base.
The airline stated it remains immensely proud of its long-standing relationship with Manchester City.
Sponsors remain silent on verdict
Other major commercial partners are taking a more cautious approach to the independent commission’s findings.
Brands such as Lucozade, Kellogg’s and Revolut have declined to comment on the situation while the legal process continues.
Majestic Wines also refused to clarify whether they would maintain their partnership with the Manchester club.
With Etihad preparing to consult lawyers, the Premier League faces a prolonged and expensive battle to defend its regulatory decisions.